I have QUESTIONS: Why did the New World Order people choose a Black Man? and more...
Posted by poulianna on Fri, 11/07/2008 - 4:50pm in What is the thinking behind choosing a Black man? There has got to be some political agenda behind this.
Does Obama fit the PROFILE needed to be claimed Leader of the NWO??? His name, his dark skin, His features are neutral could fit many ethnic backgrounds and/or nationalities. He was not born in the United States.... as some sources claim.
The African Americans are ecstatic. Its like a dream come true for the African Americans I work with and for many the African American students, I teach... its like Obama's election to the Presidency proves once and for all that African Americans are equal??? or something
Isn't it a risk to Obama that once the truth is known that he is no more interested in the black American any more than he is interested in the general public of all the people. His job is to only work and carry out orders for and by the NWO people.
Ron Paul states that Obama has all along been groomed for this position because of the amount of money he got from the NWO people to run his campaign. And, that McCain was just a good enough back up for Obama, should Obama had lost. If McCain had won I guess that would had just delayed the NWO plans a little.
If Ron Paul was aware of these underpinnings, Then why did Hillary try so hard??? Aren't the Clintons supporters of the NWO Shouldn't she had known or is she that good of an actress??? Or perhaps she was paid very well to put up a good fight.
Could some one please explain this piece of the puzzle?
Subscribe to this thread- Flag as offensive
- Login or register to post comments
- 247 reads
****
There's a story going around, hard to find that says Barry was born to an Arabian women, and Stan left with him.
For all we know, Stan had a stillborn, and his dad had impregnated the Arab women-shame!
Technically this would made him Arab-Negroid.
asuuming any of its true.
You don't see the danger of a muslin half Arab bought out by shiek monies.
Laurie
While not a direct response to your question, the demographic trends of world population certainly hold sway to the inevitability of a displaced white, colonial hegemony. The ruling elite understand these trends and always move toward state/global collectivism; the shift viewed from within the U.S. manifests as anger toward U.S. government and most non-Americans. The reality is that, from a demographic perspective, you better learn how to adapt to these changes cuz the tipping point has long since passed.
Want to understand that uncomfortable sense that your white collar/blue collar economic well-being is slowly slipping away? Read on!!
If the world were a village of 100 people...
61 villagers would be Asian (of that, 20 would be Chinese and 17 would be Indian), 14 would be African, 11 would be European, 9 would be Latin or South American, 5 would be North American, and none of the villagers would be from Australia, Oceania, or Antarctica.
At least 18 villagers would be unable to read or write but 33 would have cellular phones and 16 would be online on the Internet.
27 villagers would be under 15 years of age and 7 would be over 64 years old.
There would be an equal number of males and females.
There would be 18 cars in the village.
63 villagers would have inadequate sanitation.
33 villagers would be Christians, 20 would be Muslims, 13 would be Hindus, 6 would be Buddhists, 2 would be atheists, 12 would be non-religious, and the remaining 14 would be members of other religions.
30 villagers would be unemployed or underemployed while of those 70 who would work, 28 would work in agriculture (primary sector), 14 would work in industry (secondary sector), and the remaining 28 would work in the service sector (tertiary sector). 53 villagers would live on less than two U.S. dollars a day.
One villager would have AIDS, 26 villagers would smoke, and 14 villagers would be obese.
By the end of a year, one villager would die and two new villagers would be born so thus the population would climb to 101.
somebody that people like?
Easy, the same way they chose communism, to pretend like they care about the bottom class.
to keep people hopeful, peaceful and pacified. why not make them happy if you're going to screw them anyway?
"The government should be afraid of its people, not the other way around".
in the American global elite. The neocon/AIPAC/WAR/Party/oil-arms-drugs complex is the force behind the Bush-Cheney fiasco.
The Neo-liberal/CFR/Brezenski/Eastern Liberal Academic Establishment backs O'bama.
Clearly, it's the latter who "won." But the bickering is likely to continue. The American global elite are falling apart from within their own ranks. They are not cohesive. The Clintons were betrayed.
O'bama could turn out to be something of a loose canon.
___________________
Freedom is an inside job
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/07/will-the-gop-be-the-hell_n_1421...
Only days after losing the White House and suffering large defeats in both houses of Congress, the Republican Party is striking a posture of defiance.
Within the past 48 hours, the RNC has sent out memos blasting the president elect for appointing Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff and hiring David Axelrod to serve an advisory role.
"Barack Obama's first White House hires are hyper-partisan operatives," read a statement from spokesman Alex Conant. "For a President-elect who promised to change the tone in Washington, it's disappointing that he is filling his White House with partisan bomb-throwers."
Additionally, Republicans have put out a press release drawing attention to the fact that the president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had congratulated Obama on his victory -- as if it represented a certain brand of foreign policy acquiescence.
Not everyone within the GOP has shared the fight-them-at-every-corner mentality. Craig Shirley, a conservative consultant, argued that the party needed "to start getting about the task of what they are for," and said of the RNC memos, "You got to pick your fights. It is almost like the RNC is in desperate need of adult supervision."
Both Sen. Lindsey Graham and former White House Chief of Staff Ken Duberstein, meanwhile, have praised Emanuel's appointment. Others, including a group of young Republicans, have begun charting out a path to rebuild the party from within -- an avenue that, noticeably, isn't premised on constantly punching at the Obama administration.
And so, the Republican Party seems to be entering a crossroads: either dedicated to contesting every move made by Democrats over the next few years or working on some issues in bipartisan faith while selling itself on a new set of policy proposals. One political scientist described it as such: "they could be the 'hell no' party, or they can be the 'yes and no' party."
It is easy to see what the former strategy looks like. Grover Norquist, speaking to the Huffington Post the day after the election, noted that there is ground to be gained simply by attacking Democratic overreach.
"Barney Frank is going to be shooting legislation at [Obama], Nancy Pelosi has a backlog of legislation and in her mind she has been waiting for 20 years to push it... the pent up demand to do stuff is going to come out like a machine gun," said Norquist. "The other issue we are going to be for is stopping Obama's tax increases, massive spending program, his takeover of health care... He will create the agenda for the modern right by creating a list of programs that oddly didn't end up in his advertisements."
The "yes and no" strategy, however, is a bit more difficult to define. House Minority Leader John Boehner tried his hand in today's Washington Post by saying the GOP would "pledge to work with President-elect Barack Obama when it is in the best interest of our nation." But from there he struck a tone of defiance: "America is still a center-right country. This election was neither a referendum in favor of the left's approach to key issues nor a mandate for big government."
Conservative writer Ramesh Ponnuru took a stab of his own in a column in Friday's New York Times arguing that the GOP had to make a pledge to the middle class instead of positioning itself as strict anti-Democrats.
"The way to court these moderates is not to abandon social conservatism, which would alienate many of the voters Republicans still have. The party needs to "move to the middle" less than it needs to move to the middle class: to go back to representing the interests of voters in the middle of the income spectrum."
But the question is, how much of the party is willing to make the commitment that Ponnuru outlines? Part of the issue, another strategist told the Huffington Post, is that John McCain's campaign only heightened the schisms within the GOP. Those who believe in ideological purity and political combativeness will see the Arizona Republican's failed bid as a justification for their posture. Obama's win, in turn, becomes a failure of tactics as much as philosophy (if he had only used Reverend Wright!).
This, Shirley argues, would be the wrong interpretation -- one that could potentially damage the GOP for years to come.
"There is a third way, that is that neither the 'hell no' side or the 'yes we will work with you' side, would be to offer our own ideas and proposals and legislation and all within a framework of a conservative governing philosophy," he said. "And you see it now in the post campaign fight between the McCain staffers and Palin. It is all reductionism. It is all attack, attack, attack. The campaign is over. They can't go after Obama so they go after Palin. At some point, Republicanism has been defined in many ways as always being against things.
___________________
Freedom is an inside job
> I have QUESTIONS: Why did the New World Order people choose a Black Man?
< so that whenever somebody will criticize him, they'll be instantly labeled as rasist. this is a nobrainer.
good one awesomo...
They had to make a statement to the world that America has changed.
________________
Freedom is an inside job
was perhaps the scariest video i have seen in awhile. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for those video's , at the end there was no URL so that I could send these video's to a couple people.....If you have them could you send them to me....thanks !